Connect with us


Boris Johnson on back foot as UK tries to reset relationship with US



Joe Biden has never met Boris Johnson but his initial impressions were not favourable. Mr Biden in 2019 called the British prime minister “a physical and emotional clone” of Donald Trump; he views Brexit as a strategic disaster.

Yet when Mr Biden is inaugurated as US president next Wednesday, a new phase in UK-US relations will begin, with Mr Johnson viewing the partnership as the keystone of his post-Brexit vision of “global Britain”.

Rarely has the personal relationship between British prime minister and US president been so scratchy even before the inauguration ceremony has taken place; but both sides believe it can be overcome.

Mr Johnson’s role as host of both the G7 and UN COP26 climate change summits this year give him a unique opportunity to build a partnership based on shared policy objectives. A trade deal between the UK and US is seen as one of the big potential prizes of Brexit.

Mr Johnson smarts at the comparisons with the outgoing president, who called the UK premier “Britain Trump”. One ally says: “Boris hates the comparisons with Trump. He wants to be a mainstream European leader. When he looks in the mirror, he wants to see Macron, not Trump.”

But Brexit has tarnished Mr Johnson’s reputation in Democratic circles in Washington. Mr Biden was vice-president to Barack Obama, who made it clear that US interests were better served by Britain remaining at the heart of the European project.

The prime minister’s threat to break international law over the Brexit settlement in Northern Ireland brought a rebuke from Mr Biden, who is proud of his Irish ancestry. Mr Johnson’s suggestion in 2016 that Mr Obama disliked Britain because he was “part-Kenyan” is still remembered in Washington.

British diplomats ponder whether there will be much chemistry when Mr Biden and Mr Johnson eventually do meet. “I’m not sure Boris’s version of public school charm and florid language will work with him,” says one. “His way of conducting conversations might irritate Biden.”

But while previous presidents have bonded on a personal level — for example Bill Clinton and Tony Blair or Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher — the transatlantic relationship usually transcends the personalities of the principals.

Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan dance during the final state dinner of his presidency at the White House in 1988
Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan dance during the final state dinner of his presidency at the White House in 1988 © AP

One British official notes that the depth of commercial, military, cultural and historic ties usually combine to create a strong relationship between prime minister and president. “You can’t always tell at the outset how they will get on,” the official said. “Events forge relationships.”

Christopher Meyer, former British ambassador to Washington, said: “I think it will play out fine. On the hard issues that Joe Biden will have to address with allies, there’s a remarkable level of alignment of national interest between the US and UK.”

It is Mr Johnson’s good fortune that the completion of the Brexit process on January 1 with the conclusion of a trade deal with the EU coincided with him assuming the presidency of two major international events in 2021.

The prime minister sees “an independent” Britain as a convening power, able to operate globally and committed to the international order and upholding democratic values.

The G7 summit in June, Mr Biden’s first big international gathering, is intended to map a route out of the Covid-19 pandemic. Other democracies including South Korea, Australia and India will be invited as guests — part of an informal “D-10” group favoured by London and Washington.

“Biden will want to make a good impression,” said Kim Darroch, another former British envoy to Washington. “We should be going to them really early and asking what he wants to get out of it.”

Mr Johnson’s other piece of good fortune is that Mr Biden is committed to working with allies and to fighting climate change; in November the COP26 summit in Glasgow aims to accelerate efforts to reduce emissions.

Another area of increasing alignment between London and Washington is over China, with Mr Johnson’s government taking an increasingly hawkish stance towards Beijing, over human rights and technology issues.

While Britain, under David Cameron’s government, was accused by fellow European leaders of kowtowing to Beijing, things are changing. Mr Johnson tells colleagues: “People think I’m soft on China — that’s not true.”

Mr Johnson’s government is banning Huawei from its 5G networks — albeit under pressure from the US — and last week took action to ban Chinese imports using forced Uighur slave labour. The EU, meanwhile, signed a new investment agreement with China at the end of 2020.

Tom Tugendhat, who co-chairs the China Research Group of Tory MPs who campaign for a tougher stance on relations with Beijing, said: “The Biden team has already set out a tough agenda on China, but with much more international co-operation than the outgoing administration.”

Leslie Vinjamuri, director of the US and Americas programme at Chatham House, said: “Democracy, human rights and technology are the big umbrella areas where we should expect to see a real effort by the Johnson government and incoming Biden administration to co-ordinate policy.”

Tom Wright, an expert in US-Europe relations at the Brookings Institution, said: “I don’t think Biden’s going to hold grudges for previous things. If the UK is active in how to operationalise a lot of these shared interests and act on them and have some good ideas and initiatives, that’s going to be more important to Biden than what has gone before.”

Additional reporting by Sebastian Payne

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Royals nearly drove me to suicide, Meghan Markle tells Oprah Winfrey




Meghan Markle was left suicidal by her experience with a British royal family that refused to protect her from hateful tabloids and fretted about the skin colour of her unborn child.

Her husband, Prince Harry, was cut off financially by his father Charles, the Prince of Wales, who also stopped taking his calls.

Those were among the revelations when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex — the ex-royals who have settled in California — told US television personality Oprah Winfrey the story of a biracial fairytale romance that captivated the world and has descended into a crisis for the British monarchy.

The two-hour broadcast on Sunday was preceded by so much briefing and counter-briefing by the warring royal camps that it was exhausting before it even aired.

In the event, it had something for everyone. For “woke” fans of Meghan and Harry and committed Republicans, there was new evidence of a cruel and archaic institution that tolerates racism.

For traditionalists, there was the pleasing spectacle of two privileged young people who quit work early and then complained about their family. For broadcasters, there was a rare event in the digital era capable of capturing a truly mass audience. And for those weary of pandemic-era lockdowns, there was the temporary distraction of watching another family’s problems.

The one clear loser was Britain’s royal-watching press. Its members will have sat astonished as Winfrey, one of the US’s most celebrated interviewers, unearthed enough gossipy nuggets in one session to sustain tabloids for a decade.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex with the Queen
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex sought to distinguish their treatment by royal officials and the Queen, with Markle saying the monarch had ‘always been wonderful to me’ © POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Viewers learnt that Markle is expecting a girl this summer; that she and Prince Harry married in secret three days before the royal wedding; that they were informed their son, Archie, would not have a royal title or official protection; and that they have adopted “rescue” chickens.

“I just love rescuing!” Markle said.

The most gripping part of the interview was Markle’s confession that the stress and isolation of her royal life led her to contemplate suicide. “I just didn’t want to be alive any more,” she told Winfrey. “I thought [suicide] would have solved everything for everyone.”

Markle said she asked a senior member of staff for help but was told: “There’s nothing we can do to protect you.” Rather than checking into a hospital, as she had hoped, she went to an official event that evening with her husband because, she warned him, “I can’t be left alone”.

The pair sought to draw a distinction between the members of the royal family and the institutional scaffolding of the monarchy. Both repeatedly heaped praise on the Queen, with Markle at one point recalling a fond memory of the beloved head of the royal family sharing a blanket with her during a frigid trip.

“The Queen has always been wonderful to me,” Markle said.

But they were critical of the faceless functionaries who run “the Firm”, as the royal family is known, accusing staffers of refusing to protect Markle, in particular, from a venomous tabloid media that was determined to cast her as a villain.

The ex-royals alleged that officials fretted about the skin colour of their son Archie before he was born
Meghan Markle’s biracial identity influenced everything, with the ex-royals alleging that officials fretted about the skin colour of their son Archie before he was born © PA

As an example, Meghan cited a sensational story that the demanding bride-to-be had brought sister-in-law Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, to tears during a dress-fitting session. In fact, she said, it was the other way round — but nobody from the palace would correct the record.

“The narrative about making Kate cry was the beginning of a real character assassination,” she said.

The issue of race infused everything, with Markle eventually concluding: “I realised it was all happening just because I was breathing.”

Markle said that while she was pregnant there were “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born”.

Prince Harry saw their 2018 Australia visit as a turning point. Markle’s charming performance, he argued, had reminded his family of another glamorous — but troublesome — young bride who shone on a similar tour Down Under in 1983: his mother Diana, Princess of Wales.

“That brought back memories,” Harry said.

Markle’s biracial identity — and social media — had made their plight even worse, he argued.

Prince Harry expressed hurt that his father had not done more to support him, but also a measure of sympathy for a man born into a form of gilded captivity. “I’m acutely aware of where my family stand and how scared they are of the tabloids turning on them,” he explained.

“My father and my brother, they are trapped. They don’t get to leave,” he added.

But Harry did. He and Meghan are now living in California splendour down the road from Winfrey, straddling the worlds of British royalty and American celebrity — with their chickens.

“This year has been crazy for everybody,” Prince Harry said. “We did what we had to do.”

Source link

Continue Reading


Pharma groups spend billions to tap into booming China healthcare




Pharmaceutical groups signed partnerships with Chinese biotechnology start-ups at a record rate last year despite geopolitical tensions and concerns over intellectual property rights and data security in the country.

China has opened up its healthcare industry over the past five years, prompting US and European companies to seal deals with local companies to access the world’s second-biggest drug market.

A record 271 cross-border licensing partnerships were agreed in 2020 between multinational groups including Roche, Bayer, AbbVie and Pfizer and Chinese pharma companies, according to data from consultancy ChinaBio. The collaborations involve clinical trials, development and commercialisation and sharing data and are up nearly 50 per cent from 2019 and more than 300 per cent since 2015.

Deals are being signed despite concerns over intellectual property protection and the safety of US healthcare data in China, with analysts saying the market is too big and fast-growing to ignore.

China’s healthcare industry overtook Japan in 2016 to become the world’s second-biggest and is expected to surpass the US within three years. Pharmaceutical spending in China totalled $137bn in 2018 and will reach $140bn-$170bn by 2023, according to data provider IQVIA.

“There has been an increase in both deals where Chinese companies will develop and commercialise innovative drug candidates discovered by western companies and where multinational companies will do the same with cutting-edge Chinese-invented pharmaceuticals outside China,” said Sam Thong, chairman of Goldman Sachs’ healthcare group in the Asian investment banking division.


Potential size of pharma spending in China by 2023

Under the Made in China 2025 strategy, a scheme designed to advance the country’s technology and manufacturing goals, Beijing has set targets for domestic drug companies to make progress on innovation and has streamlined the drug approval process.

China’s state medical insurance scheme has also added more branded, non-generic drugs to a list of those that qualify for patient reimbursement, including products by foreign companies such as Novartis, in a move that could boost demand.

Western groups have already reported the financial benefits of their China strategies.

Eli Lilly, the US pharma company, agreed a $255m deal with Shanghai-listed biotechnology business Junshi Biosciences last May to collaborate on a Covid-19 antibody treatment and reported a 41 per cent jump in quarterly profit in January. Eli Lilly’s chief scientist lauded the “exciting” phase 3 trial results for the treatment with Junshi that showed the antibodies reduced risk of hospitalisation and death by 70 per cent.

Junshi said the record string of partnerships proved China’s drugs were of “international quality”.

US was the most desirable region for cross border partnering

Pfizer agreed a $480m deal in September with CStone Pharmaceuticals that gave the US group a 9.9 per cent stake in the Hong Kong-listed company, which focuses on immuno-oncology medicines, as well as an exclusive licence to commercialise CStone’s cancer drug in China.

For Chinese start-ups, the partnerships can be used as a launch pad for their global ambitions, enabling companies to carry out trials and win commercial approval for their products in the west.

Eli Lilly signed a licensing deal worth more than $1bn with Suzhou-based oncology group Innovent in August for the exclusive rights to its lung cancer therapy outside China.

AbbVie, another US pharma group, agreed to pay mainland biotech I-Mab up to $2bn for access to its experimental cancer drug in September.

“This is an important step for Chinese companies because it validates their capabilities — their R&D is reaching a global standard,” said Cathy Zhang, Morgan Stanley’s head of healthcare for global capital markets in Asia.

Column chart of Number of deals showing China pharma partnering hit a record in 2020

But China remains under pressure to better protect intellectual property, a longstanding grievance for overseas companies.

Patent law changes in 2020 gave foreign groups more confidence they would be protected, but “enforcement is still a big issue in practice”, said Rocky Wu, a Shanghai-based partner for KPMG, the professional services firm. “The detailed guidelines on implementation of patent linkage has not officially been published.”

US national security experts are also worried about Beijing gaining access to American healthcare data, particularly genomic information, for both privacy reasons and concerns about the ability to use such data to help develop biological weapons.

The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, which evaluates the national security risks attached to doing business with China, last year said Beijing had made the collection of foreign healthcare data a priority and tried to gain access to US information through “licit and illicit means”.

Chinese entities have done this through investments, partnerships and sales of equipment and services, the commission said in its 2020 report to the US Congress.

The commission added that “Beijing has placed increasingly tight restrictions on foreign firms’ ability to access and share healthcare-related data collected in China”, despite officially encouraging foreign participation.

Additional reporting by Wang Xueqiao in Shanghai, Thomas Hale in Hong Kong and Hannah Kuchler in New York

Source link

Continue Reading


Teachers grapple with how to help students scarred by pandemic




As staff at Strive Collegiate Academy in Nashville prepare for the school’s reopening this month, principal LaKendra Butler is grappling with the best way to support pupils after a traumatic year in which their education was thrown into chaos by the pandemic.

“Our students are performing 10-15 per cent below the level a year ago,” Butler said. “Right now I’m prioritising their time during the school day and making sure we’re focused on bringing them back . . . [but] longer-term we need to look at how to do school differently. We can’t go back to the status quo.”

Strive is one of tens of thousands of schools around the world, from the US to the UK and the Netherlands, that will reopen their doors in the coming weeks, as students return to the classroom after months of often solitary online study.

A first priority will be regular Covid-19 tests and measures to cut the risk of the virus spreading in schools. The longer-term challenge will be assessing how far behind pupils have fallen in their academic and emotional development and finding ways to rectify the problem with often limited resources.

Getting students back into the classroom is just the start. Many educators believe schools will need to adopt radical new approaches to learning and spend eye-watering sums of money to close the “learning gap” and prevent a generation being scarred, their prospects set back permanently.

LaKendra Butler, left, says students at Strive Collegiate Academy in Nashville are performing 10-15% below the level of a year ago
LaKendra Butler, left, says students at Strive Collegiate Academy in Nashville are performing 10-15% below the level of a year ago © STRIVE Collegiate Academy

“Covid has been the largest disruption to education in history,” said Per Engzell, a researcher at the Oxford Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science in the UK. “Ninety-five per cent of children were affected and in many countries schools have remained closed since [last] March. It’s totally unprecedented.”

Using detailed testing in the Netherlands, his team has identified an “alarming” average loss of learning equivalent in that country to one-fifth of the academic year — the entire period students were out of school in 2020. The finding “seems to bear out some of the worst misgivings on the magnitude of learning loss and social disparities”, he said.

The pattern is similar elsewhere. Jonathon Guy, research officer at the Australian Education Union, said the learning loss was even more marked for children from marginalised communities and disadvantaged groups. “Demographic factors, low levels of prior achievement and a lack of access to technology are the main concerns,” he said.

Surveys in Australia and other countries suggest widespread disparities in access to computers, affordable internet, safe places to learn and supportive home environments.

Home-schooling in remote Tarpoly Creek, New South Wales. Surveys suggest learning loss has been more marked for children from marginalised communities
Home-schooling in remote Tarpoly Creek, New South Wales. Surveys suggest learning loss has been more marked for children from marginalised communities © Lisa Maree Williams/Getty Images

Luke Sibieta, a researcher at the UK’s Institute for Fiscal Studies, has estimated that British pupils could lose a combined £350bn over their lives as a result of missed education during lockdown. According to a forecast by the World Bank, globally the loss could be as much as $10tn if effective policy responses were not introduced.

Those responses will not come cheap. In the UK, Sibieta suggested £30bn — equal to six months of spending on schools — as a useful benchmark for what the government should consider spending on “radical and properly resourced ways to help pupils catch up”.

Some teachers have sought to learn from approaches adopted after previous disruptions, such as when Hurricane Katrina overwhelmed New Orleans in 2005. Then, a so-called spiralling technique was used to reteach essential missing skills before proceeding with scheduled lessons.

David Steiner, head of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy in the US, who led a review of “catch up” techniques for Unesco, said the evidence was against strategies that promoted students automatically to the next grade regardless of the gaps in their learning or got them to retake the entire year with a younger class.

Instead, he called for “acceleration” programmes to test students and focus on missing skills essential to the next stage of study. “You need to narrow the list of topics to those that really matter and do ‘just-in-time’ instruction so they’re ready to take regular classes with grade-level peers,” he said.

Children sanitise their hands at a school near Bordeaux, France. Researchers say the pandemic has been the biggest disruption to education in history
Children sanitise their hands at a school near Bordeaux, France. Researchers say the pandemic has been the biggest disruption to education in history © Philippe Lopez/AFP via Getty Images

Butler has carved out two hours during her school’s daily schedule away from normal lessons, to focus on teaching in one-on-one and small group sessions, guided by periodic assessments of students’ progress and surveys of their parents.

She is also exploring more use of tutoring, an approach that has garnered attention around the world, including in a £1.7bn package in Britain. The UK has also appointed an “education recovery tsar” who has made clear that the catch-up would take years of work and “radical” curriculum changes.

James Turner, head of the Sutton Trust, a charity participating in the UK tutoring programme, said this was an essential response. “It’s not the complete solution but the evidence is very strong,” he said, estimating that the country would need 20,000 additional tutors to meet its objective of supporting 250,000 pupils in the current school year.

Matthew Kraft, associate professor of education and economics at Brown University in the US, cautioned that while there was strong evidence for the value of tutoring in small groups, “we know much less about scaling and maintaining its effectiveness”.

He proposed a “peer-to-peer” volunteer system where older students helped younger ones, to reinforce their own learning and give something back.

Jelmer Evers, a teacher in the Dutch city of Utrecht and vice-president of the country’s General Education Union, said the task was best tackled by qualified teachers, despite a backdrop of falling numbers entering the profession. They had greater knowledge of their students’ needs and of the curriculum than external tutors, he said.

For Amy Wood, principal at Mossbourne Riverside Academy in London, student wellbeing and social activities would be as important as academic work when her pupils return on Monday.

She remained optimistic. “Children are more resilient,” she said. “They’ll bounce back.”

Source link

Continue Reading