It was designed to prove Brazil’s commitment to protecting the Amazon, to highlight how much virgin rainforest remains and to underline the effectiveness of thousands of troops in combating illegal forest fires.
“What I wanted to show them is that we don’t have our arms crossed, we are trying to do the best that we can,” vice-president Hamilton Mourão says of the Amazon tour he hosted for 12 ambassadors last month. “They had freedom to ask whatever they wanted. It was a chance for them to see with their own eyes what they read [about] in the newspapers, books, so they can make a better analysis of what is really happening here in Brazil.”
But days before the plane carrying Mr Mourão and the diplomats took off, fresh data was published showing Amazon forest fires had more than doubled in October from the same month last year. A week after their trip, new figures showed deforestation had shot up 50 per cent in October. The government found itself on the back foot again.
The episode demonstrated one of the difficulties facing global investors as environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations come to the fore: Brazil generates some of the world’s best and worst numbers, with much of the analysis dominated by an increasingly fierce confrontation over the Amazon.
Satellite monitoring shows a surge in illegal deforestation since hard-right president Jair Bolsonaro took power in 2018, but Brazil still has more preserved rainforest than any other nation. Its energy mix is one of the world’s cleanest, with more than 80 per cent of electricity generated by renewable energy. Its biodiversity exceeds that of any other country. Its Forest Code is one of the world’s most advanced pieces of environmental legislation. Its carbon reduction targets under the Paris Agreement on climate change are among the most ambitious of any large developing economy.
Yet all the world sees, government officials complain, are images of burning trees in the Amazon.
“We are a kind people,” insisted finance minister Paulo Guedes to an audience of US investors in October. “All this story about killing Indians and burning forests is an exaggeration. We have a year and a half [in power]. I don’t believe that the Amazon was burnt in a year and a half. If something is wrong, it was wrong for the last 30 years.”
The controversy over Brazil’s failure to protect the Amazon is indeed
decades-old, though it has intensified under Mr Bolsonaro because of his rhetoric against environmentalists and the cutbacks his government has made to enforcement. Jaws dropped when he made a speech in September to a remote session of the UN General Assembly claiming that indigenous people were mainly responsible for the forest fires and insisting that Brazil was the victim of a “brutal disinformation campaign”.
This has distracted attention from what financiers in Brazil say is an important new trend: a far greater awareness among local companies of the need to adhere to ESG criteria.
Cassio Gouveia, managing director for investment banking at corporate and investment bank Itaú BBA, says attitudes have changed “dramatically”. Fulfilling ESG criteria, he says, “is a must for any company considering raising equity or debt locally or internationally”.
Brazilian asset managers are also starting to focus on ESG. Fabio Alperowitch, portfolio manager at FAMA Investimentos, an asset management firm, started ethically investing in 1993, the year after Brazil hosted the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro — a groundbreaking event at which countries agreed to tackle climate change.
“For nearly 30 years, practically nothing happened in Brazil in ESG,” Mr Alperowitch says. “Its main topics, human rights and the environment, were seen as topics of the left and as financial markets tend to be conservative, they were repulsed by these topics.
“Now there is suddenly a big demand from investors to talk about ESG.”
But he warns that it may have shallow roots. “Many people are waking up to ESG but doing so without any depth, in a very superficial way. Others simply have a commercial interest in fulfilling a demand for ESG products . . . but are really just greenwashing.”
External investor pressure has been growing. More than two dozen global financial institutions managing over $3.7tn in assets demanded in June that the government curb deforestation, which had created “uncertainty about the conditions for investing in or providing financial services to Brazil”.
Change of tone
Mr Mourão’s tour for ambassadors was partly a response to that pressure. Other arms of the Brazilian government have also reacted. The central bank has issued guidance on green finance and the agriculture ministry has drawn up a “green investment roadmap” with $163bn of sustainable projects. “I’ve been very impressed with how the central bank has been in the forefront of trying to support sustainable finance in Brazil,” says Paloma Anós Casero, World Bank country director for Brazil.
“Since June we have seen a change of tone in the government,” says one ambassador in Brazil who went on the trip with Mr Mourão. “Criticisms by investors and the private sector have had an economic impact. They did not expect that. They ignore what NGOs say but when private business says there is a problem, they go quiet and listen.”
Listening to investor concerns is one thing; producing results in the war on illegal deforestation across the vast Amazon basin is another.
“We have not yet seen much progress on the [deforestation] numbers,” says Graham Stock, head of emerging markets sovereign research at BlueBay, one of the authors of the June investor initiative. “The fire season was pretty bad this year in Brazil. We need to see progress.”
Last week Inpe, Brazil’s space agency, reported that 11,088 sq km of forest were destroyed between August 2019 and July 2020 — the biggest loss since 2008, and a 9.5 per cent increase on the same period the previous year.
With the inauguration of Joe Biden as US president next year, the pressure will only increase. Mr Biden has promised a $20bn global fund to save the Amazon and warned of “economic consequences” if Brazil does not join — a ploy that drew a typically combative response from Mr Bolsonaro.
One thing business people and investors agree on is that unless Amazon deforestation numbers go down and stay down, and Mr Bolsonaro takes a more pro-conservation line, Brazil risks scaring away more investment money.
“I’m impressed by the companies . . . by the way we are all thinking in Brazil in the private sector,” says Ilan Goldfajn, the former head of Brazil’s central bank. “But the main challenge has to do with having a macro framework and we cannot avoid having the government involved in that. The government has to embrace sustainability.”
Or, as German ambassador Heiko Thoms puts it when referring to the Amazon: “Only action will matter. We now need to see a clear long-term action plan with clearly defined objectives and numbers.”
Additional reporting by Bryan Harris in Brasília
Regulators close ranks on crypto
This article is an on-site version of our #techFT newsletter. Sign up here to get the complete newsletter sent straight to your inbox every weekday
Regulators are continuing to step up their scrutiny of cryptocurrencies, with central banks and South Korea’s tax authorities demonstrating fresh concerns.
In a report published on Wednesday, the Bank for International Settlements, the global body for central banks, argues that digital tokens such as bitcoin have few redeeming features and “work against the public good”. It also dismissed stablecoins — a link between crypto and conventional assets — as an “appendage” to traditional money.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the BIS did endorse the development of digital currencies backed by central banks, saying they could be a tool to achieve greater financial inclusion and lower the high costs of payments. “Central bank digital currencies . . . offer in digital form the unique advantages of central bank money: settlement finality, liquidity and integrity,” it said.
In contrast, bitcoin wasted energy and cryptocurrencies were “speculative assets rather than money, and in many cases are used to facilitate money laundering, ransomware attacks and other financial crimes”.
South Korea has acted against the financial crime of tax evasion, with more than Won53bn ($47m) of bitcoin, ethereum and other cryptoassets confiscated from 12,000 people. Officials said it was the largest “cryptocurrency seizure for back taxes in Korean history” and noted that local exchanges had allegedly been used to conceal assets because they did not collect the resident registration numbers of account holders. Many of South Korea’s 60 crypto exchanges are battling to meet regulatory conditions to operate beyond September.
This week’s #techAsia newsletter asks whether the death knell is being sounded for cryptocurrencies. That could be the case in China, where it is scaling up tests of its official digital renminbi, and appears serious about stamping out the crypto industry on its soil. Bitcoin fell below $30,000 on Tuesday following the latest regulatory crackdown, but it has recovered to be worth more than $34,000 today.
The Internet of (Five) Things
1. Migrant workers locked up in Taiwan
With Taiwan under pressure to increase manufacturing output to ease global shortages, particularly of semiconductors, electronics groups including Japan’s Canon and Innolux, an affiliate of Apple supplier Foxconn, have been accused of locking up migrant workers amid an outbreak of Covid-19. Some companies have forbidden migrant workers from leaving the dormitories where they live except to go to work.
#techFT brings you news, comment and analysis on the big companies, technologies and issues shaping this fastest moving of sectors from specialists based around the world. Click here to get #techFT in your inbox.
2. SoftBank not a ‘one-man show’, says Son
Masayoshi Son has told shareholders that SoftBank will not prioritise short-term trading gains as the company behind the world’s most aggressive technology fund was grilled over governance failures after the collapses of Greensill and Katerra. At its annual shareholder meeting, the 63-year-old billionaire founder defended the Japanese conglomerate’s governance structure, saying the board was not “Masayoshi Son’s one-man show”.
3. Toshiba’s ’dark arts’ and dirty tricks
Today’s Big Read sets the stage for Japan’s most contentious annual shareholder meeting in decades. At its centre is the fate of Osamu Nagayama, the widely respected chair of Toshiba who faces being swept away by a mass shareholder revolt that could — in a single vote on Friday — sack the entire board of one of Japan’s most famous industrial names.
4. ‘Amazon effect’ hits US wages
Companies struggling to find workers as the US economy reopens have blamed higher unemployment benefits, limited immigration, childcare challenges . . . and Amazon. The ecommerce leader recruited aggressively last year, hiring 500,000 people worldwide, while in the US, it paid at least $15 an hour before benefits, double the federal minimum wage.
5. US takes down Iranian websites
US authorities have seized dozens of websites linked to Iranian groups, including the Revolutionary Guards, accusing them of spreading misinformation and operating in the country without licences. The Department of Justice said 36 websites had been taken down, 33 of which were operated by the Iranian Islamic Radio and Television Union.
Tech tools — Brave and Vivaldi push privacy
Pro-privacy browser Brave has launched a global beta of its own-brand search engine Brave Search, reports Techcrunch. The non-tracking search engine is being offered as one of multiple search options that users of the browser can pick from (including Google’s), but Brave says it will make it the default search later this year. Meanwhile, a 4.0 version of Vivaldi, which offers similar browser privacy features, was launched this month. It has now added translation and the options of adding an email client, calendar and RSS reader.
China bolsters ties with Myanmar junta despite international condemnation
Trade and diplomatic ties between Myanmar and China are normalising in the face of intense domestic opposition and international condemnation of the military junta that seized power in February.
Beijing has strengthened relations with Myanmar’s military leaders despite a series of violent attacks against Chinese business interests in the country after Aung San Suu Kyi’s government was toppled.
Yun Sun, an expert on Myanmar-China relations with the Stimson Center, a US think-tank, said Beijing had already made a “fundamental assessment” that Myanmar was moving into another prolonged period of military rule.
“I think the Chinese can see that this military coup is successful and is here to stay,” she added.
The resumption of state-level engagements and economic activity signals that Myanmar is reverting to its traditional economic reliance on China. The country has used its larger neighbour as a buffer against international sanctions and divestment by foreign investors, who have announced plans to quit the country or shelved projects.
Since the coup, 875 people have been killed by the junta and 6,242 arrested, according to the Assistance Association of Political Prisoners (Burma), a human rights group. The country’s economy and public services were severely disrupted by mass protests in the three months that followed the putsch, and have only partially recovered.
The resumption of bilateral trade will fuel the widespread suspicion among anti-coup resistance groups that China was prepared to support the new military regime.
The cumulative value of China’s imports from Myanmar for the first five months of the year was $3.38bn, up from $2.43bn in 2020 and $2.56bn in 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic, according to official Chinese customs data.
Exports to Myanmar for the same period have not recovered to the same extent, however. By the end of May, goods valued at $4.28bn had been shipped to Myanmar, compared with $4.56bn and $4.79bn in the two previous years.
In a further sign of strengthening diplomatic relations, Chen Hai, China’s ambassador to Myanmar, met coup leader and military commander-in-chief Min Aung Hlaing in Naypyidaw, the capital, in June. In a subsequent statement, Chen referred to Min Aung Hlaing as the leader of Myanmar.
China was among the countries that abstained in a UN general assembly vote last week calling on the international community to halt the flow of arms to Myanmar and release Aung San Suu Kyi and other political detainees.
Beijing had good relations with the government of the deposed leader, who is in detention facing multiple criminal charges. However, it has refrained from criticising the military, fanning anger among the mass protest movement that sprang up after the coup.
Beyond being Myanmar’s biggest trading partner, China also has strategic infrastructure investments in the country, including energy pipelines that give Beijing a critical link to the Indian Ocean.
James Char, a Myanmar expert at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, said many people in Myanmar still blamed the Chinese government and business interests for complicity in supporting the military’s decades of rule before the transition to democracy.
“The Chinese, themselves, are very clear about [public sentiment in Myanmar],” Char said.
Attacks on China-linked businesses in the wake of the coup culminated in an explosion at a Chinese-backed textile factory west of Yangon on June 11, according to reports from local Myanmar media, as well as junta-controlled information services and Chinese state media.
Beijing’s wariness of inflaming Myanmar protesters would probably slow Chinese direct investments and the resumption of planned larger-scale developments that formed part of President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative, analysts said.
Additional reporting by Sherry Fei Ju in Beijing
Australia calls Great Barrier Reef warning politically motivated
Australia has labelled a draft decision by the UN’s World Heritage Committee to include the Great Barrier Reef on its “in danger” list as politically motivated.
The committee, which is chaired by Tian Xuejun, China’s vice-minister for education, and selects Unesco World Heritage sites, proposed adding the world’s largest collection of coral reefs to the danger list because of the damaging impact of climate change and coastal development.
The designation could ultimately lead to the reef losing its World Heritage status, although officials said listing was intended to prompt emergency action to safeguard a living structure that stretches 2,300km along Australia’s eastern coast.
But Sussan Ley, Australia’s environment minister, said the government had been “blindsided” by the committee’s finding and alleged there was a lack of consultation and transparency. She added that Canberra would challenge the draft decision.
“When procedures are not followed, when the process is turned on its head five minutes before the draft decision is due to be published, when the assurances my officials received and indeed I did have been upended, what else can you conclude but that it is politics?” she said.
That the World Heritage Committee is chaired by a senior Chinese official has stoked suspicions in Canberra that it had been singled out over its diplomatic and trade clash with Beijing.
China-Australia relations have soured following Canberra’s call last year for an inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 and Beijing’s imposition of tariffs on Australian wine and barley imports.
Ley said she and Marise Payne, Australia’s foreign minister, had already spoken with Audrey Azoulay, Unesco director-general, to complain about the draft decision.
But scientists downplayed the suggestion that the “in danger” listing was politically motivated. Three mass bleaching events in five years demonstrated the need for the government to do more to tackle climate change, they said.
“I’m seeing some press coverage saying this is all a plot by China not to buy wine, lobsters and to screw the Barrier Reef. I think that’s pretty far-fetched given that the draft decision released overnight will be voted on by 21 countries,” said Terry Hughes, professor of marine biology at James Cook University.
The controversy will heap further international pressure on Canberra, which has been pressed by the US, UK and others to commit to a national target of net-zero emissions by 2050.
In a draft decision due to be voted on next month, the committee urged Canberra to “provide clear commitments to address threats from climate change, in conformity with the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement, and allow to meet water quality targets faster”.
It noted the loss of almost one-third of shallow-water coral cover following a “bleaching” event in 2016 — a process linked to warmer than normal water that can lead to a mass die-off of coral.
The row over the “in danger” listing occurred at a difficult time for Australia’s conservative coalition, which is embroiled in internal squabbling over climate policies.
On Monday, Barnaby Joyce, a climate sceptic and supporter of coal mining, ousted Michael McCormack to become leader of the National party, the junior coalition partner to the Liberal party, and Australia’s deputy prime minister. Joyce is expected to oppose any move to commit to net zero by 2050.
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.
Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here
DUP’s new leader strives to stabilise N Ireland’s biggest party
A blueprint for central bank digital currencies
Krispy Kreme: sugary valuation piles on the dollars
Italy’s government in crisis as Renzi ministers resign
Macron’s war on ‘Islamic separatism’ only divides France further
US allows sales of chips to Huawei’s non-5G businesses
Europe5 months ago
Italy’s government in crisis as Renzi ministers resign
Europe8 months ago
Macron’s war on ‘Islamic separatism’ only divides France further
Emerging Markets8 months ago
US allows sales of chips to Huawei’s non-5G businesses
Europe6 months ago
European truckmakers to phase out diesel sales decade earlier than planned
Emerging Markets9 months ago
Mexico’s Supreme Court approves referendum on presidential trials
Company8 months ago
Most investors now expect the U.S. stock market to crash like it did in October 1987 — why that’s good news
Markets8 months ago
Two top Morgan Stanley commodities traders lose jobs over use of WhatsApp
Emerging Markets8 months ago
Arrest of Mexican general in US shakes López Obrador at home and abroad