Connect with us

Emerging Markets

Beijing wrestles for control of Hong Kong’s classrooms

Published

on


Leo is on the frontline of an ideological battle with Beijing for control of the territory’s education system.

Since the Hong Kong government began cracking down on education in the Asian financial hub this year, the Hong Kong teacher said a climate of fear and suspicion has gripped his secondary school.

“I have had to stop teaching reality as I know it to avoid violating the rules,” said Leo, who teaches liberal studies, a course designed to foster critical thinking among students. “If they [students] think too independently and . . . in a way that is a ‘problem’ [for the authorities] . . . then I am to blame,” he said, declining to disclose his full name for fear of retaliation.

In response to anti-government protests over the past 18 months, in which school-age students played a significant role, Beijing has tightened its grip over the city’s educational institutions with the passage of a tough national security law in June. The Hong Kong government is investigating hundreds of teachers for allegedly radicalising their pupils.

This week, it struck one primary school teacher off the register — rendering the person unemployable — allegedly for discussing an illegal pro-independence political party in the classroom. 

Last month, a high school student was suspended for displaying a protest-related slogan in an online class.

Pro-Beijing politicians have targeted “liberal studies” in particular. The subject aims to better prepare students in late high school for the modern workforce by teaching them to think for themselves, especially about current affairs.

“Targeting liberal studies is scapegoating,” said Victoria Hui, an associate professor for politics at the University of Notre Dame in the US. She said the authorities were looking for an excuse to explain why young people had turned against the government.

Hong Kong’s government made liberal studies compulsory in 2009 with the slogan: “It benefits you for life.” But pro-Beijing figures quickly grew concerned that the subject, with modules such as Hong Kong Today and Modern China, covered areas the Communist party considered taboo. 

Most schools openly discussed events such as the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, making Hong Kong students the only pupils in China permitted to examine the incident.

A study commissioned by the government’s Central Policy Unit in 2016 concluded that liberal studies had minimal influence on students’ civic and political opinions. But many students said the subject had stimulated their interest in social and political issues.

“I learnt [from liberal studies] how bad the Communist party could be,” said Bosco, a high school student who helped organise some of last year’s protests. Liberal studies had taught him “the ugly side” of China, he added. 

For the Hong Kong government, the last straw was the large number of pupils participating in the protests. About 17 per cent of the nearly 10,000 protesters arrested were younger than 18, police said. Since the protests began, officials have investigated more than 200 teachers for alleged violations and issued more than 30 reprimands and warnings.

“Why do our kindergartens, primary and secondary schools have teachers who bully the children of police in classrooms, spread hateful ideas and publicly express malice towards the police on social media,” said CY Leung, former Hong Kong chief executive, on Facebook.

Mr Leung has called for the Education Bureau to publish the names of teachers who have been disciplined over the protests and has offered a HK$100,000 ($13,000) reward to anyone giving information on those spreading “political propaganda” to students.

Apart from targeting teachers, the government has also urged publishers to voluntarily rewrite liberal studies textbooks. Publishers have dropped references to Hong Kong’s observance of “the separation of powers”, once considered a hallmark of the city’s common law legal system, and removed photos of its 2014 pro-democracy “Umbrella Movement”. 

The new textbooks also play down China’s pollution problem and issues with workers’ rights, according to local media and Education Breakthrough, an advocacy group. A line critical of China’s rubber-stamp parliament was removed from new versions of the textbooks, too.

The pro-democracy Hong Kong Professional Teachers’ Union criticised the edits as “political censorship”.

But Lawrence Tang, of the pro-establishment Hong Kong Federation of Education Workers, said liberal studies had focused too much on “critical thinking” and missed out on “national identity and patriotism”.

The government seems poised to impose even tighter restrictions. A special task force appointed to review the liberal studies curriculum recommended last month that the authorities conduct compulsory screening of all textbooks and retrain teachers.

On Tuesday, chief executive Carrie Lam said if teachers were spreading “wrong messages to promote misunderstanding about the nation . . . then that becomes a very serious matter”. 

The government campaign has had a chilling effect on academic freedom in Hong Kong’s education system, according to teachers and students. 

Tin Fong-chak, who has taught liberal studies for 10 years, said some of his colleagues had stopped using their own teaching materials and were restricting themselves to official textbooks to avoid trouble.

Even battle-hardened student protesters were censoring their views at school to avoid being given a fail mark. 

Moke Cheung, a form-five student who participated in last year’s protests, said: “I am worried about my grades if I write something the teacher disapproves of.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Emerging Markets

NYSE to suspend trading of China’s Cnooc next month

Published

on

By


The New York Stock Exchange is to start delisting proceedings against China National Offshore Oil Corporation to comply with an executive order from Donald Trump that bans Americans from investing in companies with ties to the Chinese military.

The NYSE on Friday said it would suspend trading in Cnooc’s American depository shares on March 9, after determining that the company was “no longer suitable for listing” following the order that the former US president signed in November.

The order banned investing in several dozen Chinese groups that were last year put on a Pentagon blacklist of companies that are accused of working with the People’s Liberation Army and threatening US security. Trump set a January 28 deadline for the ban to take effect, but President Joe Biden pushed the deadline back to May 27.

The NYSE move comes as Biden evaluates a number of assertive actions that Trump took against China during his last year in office. The commerce department last year put Cnooc on a separate blacklist — called the “entity list” — that makes it hard for US companies to sell products and technology to the Chinese oil group.

The Biden administration has not made clear whether it intends to keep Trump’s executive order in place. But the new president and his officials have so far adopted a tough stance towards China over everything from its economic “coercion” to concerns about its clampdown on the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong to the repression of more than 1m Uighur Muslims in the northwestern Chinese province of Xinjiang.

Earlier this month, Biden used his first conversation with Chinese president Xi Jinping since assuming office to raise concerns about Hong Kong and Xinjiang, and aggressive Chinese actions towards Taiwan. Antony Blinken, secretary of state, also described the detention of Uighurs in labour camps as “genocide”.

Jen Psaki, White House press secretary, has said the administration was conducting a number of “complex reviews” of the China actions that Trump took. The former president put dozens of other Chinese companies on the Pentagon and commerce department blacklists, including Huawei, the Chinese telecoms equipment group.



Source link

Continue Reading

Emerging Markets

Bond sell-off roils markets, ex-Petrobras chief hits back, Ghana’s first Covax vaccines

Published

on

By


The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury exceeded 1.5 per cent for the first time in a year and the outgoing head of Petrobras warns Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro against state controlled fuel prices. Plus, the FT’s Africa editor, David Pilling, discusses the Covax vaccine rollout in low-income countries. 

Wall Street stocks sell off as government bond rout accelerates

https://www.ft.com/content/ea46ee81-89a2-4f23-aeff-2a099c02432c

Ousted Petrobras chief hits back at Bolsonaro 

https://www.ft.com/content/1cd6c9fb-3201-4815-9f4f-61a4f0881856?

Africa will pay more for Russian Covid vaccine than ‘western’ jabs

https://www.ft.com/content/ffe40c7d-c418-4a93-a202-5ee996434de7


See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

A transcript for this podcast is currently unavailable, view our accessibility guide.



Source link

Continue Reading

Emerging Markets

Petrobras/Bolsonaro: bossa boots | Financial Times

Published

on

By


“Brazil is not for beginners.” Composer Tom Jobim’s remark about his homeland stands as a warning to gung-ho foreign investors. Shares in Petrobras have fallen almost a fifth since President Jair Bolsonaro said he would replace the widely respected chief executive of the oil giant.

Firebrand Bolsonaro campaigned on a free-market platform. Now he is reverting to the interventionism of leftist predecessors. It is the latest reminder that a country with huge potential has big political and social problems.

Bolsonaro reacted to fuel protests by pushing for a retired army general to supplant chief executive Roberto Castello Branco, who had refused to lower prices. This is politically advantageous but economically short-sighted.

Fourth-quarter ebitda beat expectations at R$60bn (US$11bn), announced late on Wednesday, a 47 per cent increase on the previous quarter. This partly reflected the reversal of a R$13bn charge for healthcare costs. Investors now have to factor the cost of possible fuel subsidies into forecasts. The last time Petrobras was leaned on, it set the company back about R$60bn (US$24bn at the time). That equates to 40 per cent of forecast ebitda for 2021.

At just over 8 times forward earnings, shares trade at a sharp discount to global peers. Forcing Petrobras to cut fuel prices will make sales of underperforming assets harder to pull off and debt reduction less certain. Bidders may fear the obligation to cap prices will apply to them too.

A booming local stock market, rock bottom interest rates and low levels of foreign debt are giving Bolsonaro scope to spend his way out of the Covid-19 crisis. But the economy remains precarious. Public debt stands at 90 per cent of gross domestic product. The real — at R$5.40 per US dollar — remains near record lows. Brazil’s credit is rated junk by big agencies.

Rising developed market yields will make financings costlier for developing nations such as Brazil. So will high-handed treatment of minority investors. It sends a dire signal when a government with an economic stake of just over a third uses its voting majority to deliver a boardroom coup.

If you are a subscriber and would like to receive alerts when Lex articles are published, just click the button “Add to myFT”, which appears at the top of this page above the headline.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending