Connect with us


July-September GDP expected to contract by about minus 9%: Deutsche Bank



A lot of things are expected from RBI and the market is eagerly waiting for the announcement of the three external MPC members as well as the date of the next policy meeting, says Kaushik Das, Director & Chief Economist, India and South Asia at Deutsche Bank AG.

How are you looking at the overall outlook in terms of the economic pain because that clearly has not abated. What is the need of the hour to help revive the economy?
We are seeing sequential improvement from the April lows. We will soon have the core infrastructure production number for August and could see a minus 5% to minus 7% contraction compared to minus 9.5% that we saw in July. There should be the same kind of number for industrial production as well for the month of August, coming down to probably minus 3% to minus 5% in September.

Over a period of time, there will be sequential improvement and we are projecting July-September GDP to contract about minus 9% compared to minus 24% that we got in April-June. So the worst seems to be over. The only thing is that sequential improvement could be slow and it will take probably mid 2021 before we can reach the pre Covid-19 levels or even after that.

We would expect the government to announce some fiscal stimulus measures now that the economy has started opening up. We are already in unlock four phase and therefore in the second half of the fiscal year starting from October, we would expect the government to announce fiscal stimulus worth 0.5% of GDP which for the time being should be okay together with RBI keeping rates on the lower side for a long time.

While the central government really has deferred the loan moratorium case to the 5th of October there have been hints of this holistic package, what exactly is it that you think they are working with and could potentially be announced?
They have already announced the onetime restructuring of loans and so the market will focus more on that. Sufficient time has been given, a two-year time period for restructuring the loans, within which you can have moratorium as well. Now we need to see how many companies are coming and asking for restructuring from the banks that will be evident in a few months’ time and it will indicate what kind of stress we have in the system.

That is not yet clear but this time RBI would also be focussing on giving the GDP growth forecast for the year and the inflation forecast for the different quarters going forward. The last forecast that we got from the RBI was in February 2020. It has been close to six months and we would expect some forecasts from RBI. It would be interesting to see what kind of growth contraction RBI is working with.

We have a growth forecast of minus 8% for FY21 and inflation averaging about 5.7% for the year. So RBI’s forecast will give the market an idea of the kind of risk band RBI and MPC will be working with which can inform the market going forward. What will also be interesting to know from RBI is when the next policy is announced or outside the policies, what is RBI’s thought process in buying government bonds because there will be a lot of supply of government bonds which will be hitting the market and today sometime the second half borrowing program would be announced,

Our expectation is that the second half borrowing would be about Rs 4.3 trillion in line with the Rs 12 trillion that has been announced so far. Then later at some point of time, there could be a risk of increasing that borrowing amount but not at this stage. So the question is who will be buying these bonds and whether RBI will show the intent in doing more open market purchases and that will help them support the bond yields at 6%. A lot of things are expected from RBI and the market is eagerly waiting for the announcement of the three external MPC members as well as the date of the next policy meeting.

Already we have perceived that given a borrowing number, the government is unlikely to increase its borrowing any further and may leave room for some hike at the end of the fiscal. We might see a spike in yields but is there any room to manoeuvre here?
At this stage, we are not expecting any outright announcement of increase in borrowings. The government has borrowed Rs 7.7 trillion INR out of the Rs 12 trillion in April to September and so Rs 4.3 trillion is left. If there is any borrowing above Rs 5 trillion, the market will take it negatively. But we are expecting the balance amount Rs 4.3 trillion to be announced and then maybe in December-January, when the government has a better sense of how much shortfall they will finally have on the revenue side or what is the outlook on fiscal deficit, when they are going to present the next budget on 1st February, there is a risk the market is pricing in.

In January to March, there could be a risk of increasing market borrowing if the government is not able to get enough revenues and the fiscal deficit goes up. So that risk is there but not at this stage in my view. We will see how it goes. We are working with a fiscal deficit estimate of 8% of GDP. That 8% of GDP includes a bit of stimulus that the government has already given and probably will give another 0.5% but that is it. So you will have 8% of GDP fiscal deficit from the centre and 5% from the states — a total 13% of GDP for India as a whole and that itself will push the debt GDP to close to 87% in FY21 from 72% last year.

The government does not have too much fiscal space and therefore they are a bit conservative about increasing market borrowings further because yields will have a natural tendency to move up if the borrowing numbers are high.

Second, RBI is not in a position to cut rates in the short term because inflation has moved up and the September number could be higher than the previous two months of 6.7% because onion, tomato, potato prices have gone up and we probably could get a 7% handle on inflation in September.

If RBI is not cutting interest rates and the supply of bonds are hitting the market, then the only expectation is that RBI will be buying a lot of bonds to help yields stabilise at around that 6% mark, which RBI is working with for the time being.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


High-priced tech stocks sink further into bear market territory




Some of the hottest technology stocks and funds of recent months have fallen into bear market territory and investors are betting on more turmoil to come, as rising bond yields undermine the case for holding high-priced shares.

A Friday afternoon stock market rally notably failed to include shares in Tesla and exchange traded funds run by Cathie Wood, the fund manager who has become one of the electric carmaker’s most vocal backers.

Shares in Tesla fell 3.6 per cent on Friday to close below $600 for the first time in more than three months, although it had been down as much as 13 per cent at one point. The stock is down 32 per cent from its January peak, erasing $263bn in market value.

Wood’s $21.5bn flagship Ark Innovation ETF — 10 per cent of which is invested in Tesla shares — also closed lower on Friday. It is now down 25 per cent and in a bear market, defined as a decline of more than one-fifth from peak.

Clean energy funds run by Invesco, which were last year’s best-performing funds, are also in bear market territory, along with some of the highest-flying stocks in the technology and biotech sectors.

“Bubble stocks and many aggressively priced US biotechnology stocks have been the hardest hit segments of the equity market,” said Peter Garnry, head of equity strategy at Saxo Bank.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite index fell into correction territory — defined as a decline of more than 10 per cent from peak — earlier this week but rebounded 1.6 per cent on Friday as bond yields stabilised.

The yield on 10-year US Treasuries yield briefly rose above 1.6 per cent early in the day after a robust employment report for February buoyed confidence in a US economic recovery. Yields were less than 1 per cent at the start of the year.

Rising long-term bond yields reduce the relative value of companies’ future cash flows, hitting fast-growing companies particularly hard.

These type of companies figure prominently in thematic investing funds run by Wood at Ark Investments. The performance of Ark’s exchange traded funds has abruptly reversed after they recorded huge inflows and strong gains for much of the past 12 months.

“The speculative tech trade is in various stages of rolling over right now,” said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek, a research group.

Bar chart of  showing Hot stocks and funds enter bear market territory

RBC derivatives strategist Amy Wu Silverman said investors were still putting on hedges in case of further declines in high-flying securities, including options that would pay off if Tesla and the Ark Innovation fund drop in value.

The number of put options on the Ark fund hit an all-time high on Thursday, according to Bloomberg data. By contrast, demand for put options on ETFs such as State Street’s SPDR S&P 500 fund — which reflects the broader stock market — have fallen as stocks have dropped.

Demand for options normally slides as a stock or ETF slumps in value, given there was “less to hedge, since you got your down move”, Silverman said. The elevated put option activity on speculative tech stocks and funds was “suggesting investors believe there is more to go”, she said.

Even after the declines, stocks in the Ark Innovation ETF remain highly valued, with a median price-to-sales ratio of 22 versus 2.5 for the broader stock market according to Morningstar, the data provider.

Two of the fund’s other big holdings, the streaming company Roku and the payments group Square, were also lower on Friday, extending recent declines.

Ark’s other leading ETFs have also retreated sharply as air has come out of Tesla and other hot stocks. Tesla is the largest holding in Ark’s $3.3bn Autonomous Tech and Robotics fund and its $7.2bn Next Generation Internet ETF.

Wood has also taken concentrated holdings in small, innovative companies. Ark holds stakes of more than 10 per cent in 26 small companies across its five actively managed ETFs, according to Morningstar.

“These large stakes raise concerns around capacity and liquidity management,” said Ben Johnson, director of passive funds research at Morningstar. “The more of a company the firm owns, the more difficult it will be to add to or reduce its position without pushing prices against fund shareholders.”

Ark did not respond to a request for comment. The Ark Innovation ETF is still sitting on a performance gain of 120 per cent for the past year. It bought more shares in Tesla when the carmaker’s shares began falling last month.

Source link

Continue Reading


Powell inflation remarks send Asian stocks lower




Asian stocks were mostly lower after a rout in US Treasuries spread to the region after comments from Jay Powell that failed to stem inflation concerns in the US.

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng dropped 0.3 per cent following the remarks by the chairman of the US Federal Reserve while Japan’s Topix rose 0.1 per cent and the S&P/ASX 200 fell 0.8 per cent in Australia.

China’s CSI 300 index of Shanghai- and Shenzhen-listed stocks dropped as much as 2 per cent before pulling back to be down 0.5 per cent by the end of the morning session, after Beijing set a target of “above 6 per cent” for economic growth in 2021.

Premier Li Keqiang hailed China’s recovery from an “extraordinary” year and said the government wanted to create at least 11m urban jobs at a meeting of the National People’s Congress, the annual meeting of the country’s rubber-stamp parliament.

“A target of over 6 per cent will enable all of us to devote full energy to promoting reform, innovation and high-quality development,” Li said, adding that Beijing would “sustain healthy economic growth” as it kicked off the new five-year plan.

Analysts were less sanguine on China’s economic outlook, however, pointing to the markedly lower growth target relative to recent years.

“There is, in fact, not much surprise from the government work report except for the super-low GDP target,” said Iris Pang, chief economist for Greater China at ING, who estimated growth would be 7 per cent this year. “This makes me feel uneasy as I don’t know what exactly the government wants to tell us about the recovery path it expects.”

The mixed performance from Asia-Pacific stocks came after Powell failed to alleviate fears that the US central bank was reacting too slowly to rising inflation expectations and longer-term Treasury yields, which rise as bond prices fall.

Powell on Thursday said he expected the Fed would be “patient” in withdrawing support for the US economic recovery as unemployment remained well above targeted levels. But he added that it would take greater disorder in markets and tighter financial conditions generally to prompt further intervention by the central bank.

“As it relates to the bond market, I’d be concerned by disorderly conditions in markets or by a persistent tightening in financial conditions broadly that threatens the achievement of our goals,” Powell said.

Yields on 10-year US Treasuries jumped 0.07 percentage points to 1.55 per cent following Powell’s remarks. In Asian trading on Friday, they climbed another 0.02 percentage points to 1.57 per cent. The yield on the 10-year Australian treasury rose 0.07 percentage points to 1.83 per cent

“Based on our growth forecast, longer-term rates will likely rise for the next few quarters — but more slowly,” said Eric Winograd, a senior economist at AllianceBernstein. “And we think the Fed is prepared to push in the other direction if rates rise too far, too fast.”

The S&P 500, which closed Thursday’s session down 1.3 per cent, was tipped by futures markets to fall another 0.1 per cent when trading begins on Wall Street. The FTSE 100 was set to fall 0.8 per cent.

Source link

Continue Reading


Financial bubbles also lead to golden ages of productive growth




Sir Alastair Morton had a volcanic temper. I know this because a story I wrote in the early 1990s questioning whether Eurotunnel’s shares were worth anything triggered an eruption from the company’s then boss. Calls were made, voices raised, resignations demanded. 

Thankfully, I kept my job. Eurotunnel’s equity was also soon crushed under a mountain of debt. Nevertheless, the company was refinanced and the project completed. I raised a glass to Morton’s ferocious determination on a Eurostar train to Paris a decade later.

With hindsight, Eurotunnel was a classic example of a productive bubble in miniature. Amid great euphoria about the wonders of sub-Channel travel, capital was sucked into financing a great enterprise of unknown worth.

Sadly, Eurotunnel’s earliest backers were not among its financial beneficiaries. But the infrastructure was built and, pandemics aside, it provides a wonderful service and makes a return. It was a lesson on how markets habitually guess the right direction of travel, even if they misjudge the speed and scale of value creation.

That is worth thinking about as we worry whether our overinflated markets are about to burst. Will something productive emerge from this bubble? Or will it just be a question of apportioning losses? “All productive bubbles generate a lot of waste. The question is what they leave behind,” says Bill Janeway, the veteran investor.

Fuelled by cheap money and fevered imaginations, funds have been pouring into exotic investments typical of a late-stage bull market. Many commentators have drawn comparisons between the tech bubble of 2000 and the environmental, social and governance frenzy of today. Some $347bn flowed into ESG investment funds last year and a record $490bn of ESG bonds were issued. 

Last month, Nicolai Tangen, the head of Norway’s $1.3tn sovereign wealth fund, said that investors had been right to back tech companies in the late 1990s — even if valuations went too high — just as they were right to back ESG stocks today. “What is happening in the green shift is extremely important and real,” Tangen said. “But to what extent stock prices reflect it correctly is another question.”

If the past is any guide to the future, we can hope that this proves to be a productive bubble, whatever short-term financial carnage may ensue.

In her book Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, the economist Carlota Perez argues that financial excesses and productivity explosions are “interrelated and interdependent”. In fact, past market bubbles were often the mechanisms by which unproven technologies were funded and diffused — even if “brilliant successes and innovations” shared the stage with “great manias and outrageous swindles”.

In Perez’s reckoning, this cycle has occurred five times in the past 250 years: during the Industrial Revolution beginning in the 1770s, the steam and railway revolution in the 1820s, the electricity revolution in the 1870s, the oil, car and mass production revolution in the 1900s and the information technology revolution in the 1970s. 

Each of these revolutions was accompanied by bursts of wild financial speculation and followed by a golden age of productivity increases: the Victorian boom in Britain, the Roaring Twenties in the US, les trente glorieuses in postwar France, for example.

When I spoke with Perez, she guessed we were about halfway through our latest technological revolution, moving from a phase of narrow installation of new technologies such as artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, 3D printing and vertical farms to one of mass deployment.

Whether we will subsequently enter a golden age of productivity, however, will depend on creating new institutions to manage this technological transformation and green transition, and pursuing the right economic policies.

To achieve “smart, green, fair and global” economic growth, Perez argues the top priority should be to transform our taxation system, cutting the burden on labour and long-term investment returns, and further shifting it on to materials, transport and dirty energy.

“We need economic growth but we need to change the nature of economic growth,” she says. “We have to radically change relative cost structures to make it more expensive to do the wrong thing and cheaper to do the right thing.”

Albeit with excessive enthusiasm, financial markets have bet on a greener future and begun funding the technologies needed to bring it to life. But, just as in previous technological revolutions, politicians must now play their part in shaping a productive result.

Source link

Continue Reading